☎The Voice Line voice account Open the partner account
paid
Affiliate disclosure. The partner link in the masthead and in the band beside the copy on this page is a sponsored link to a partner operator, and this site may be paid if you open an account through it, at no extra cost to you. It carries rel="sponsored noopener" and opens in a new tab. A page about what a call keeps should not leave its own funding unsaid: one link funds the site, no operator is named, rated or recommended anywhere on it, and no operator is described by any figure on it.
The Voice Line / the two quotes
read aloud, or shown

The price read aloud and the price on the screen

A price spoken on a call is not always the price a screen shows for the same market at the same moment. This page matches 1,200 telephone bets to their screen price, counts how often the spoken price was worse, and shows what the gap comes to.

Desk spec
matched bets
1,200
worse on the phone
408
equal
744
better
48
worse share
34.0%
mean gap where worse
2.7%
the price read aloudThe spoken price, obtained after a hold. Across 1,200 matched bets it was worse than the screen in 408 and worse by a mean 2.7%.
the recordingThe record of what was said, kept for a fixed window. Of 96 disputes it decided 71, and 46 of those against the caller.
the channel costHold time plus call time. A mean 9.5 minutes on the line, or 4.75 where a number is billed at 0.50 a minute.
Direct answer

For the same market at the same moment, the price read aloud on a call was worse than the screen price in 408 of 1,200 invented matched bets, equal in 744 and better in 48. Where it was worse it was worse by a mean of 2.7%, and the price is spoken after a wait rather than shown before the call.

the spoken price against the screen price, 1,200 matched bets
outcomebetssharemean gap
worse on the phone40834.0%2.7% worse
equal74462.0%0.0%
better on the phone484.0%1.1% better
the phone is worse more often than it is better, by a factor of8.5x
where the gap comes from three reasons the spoken price can differ 1 the market moved between the screen quote and the spoken one the price is read after the hold, not before it 2 the two menus are not the same the spoken menu is a fraction of the screen menu 3 the price is read, not printed a printed price can be compared; a spoken one is agreed the moment it is accepted worse 408, equal 744, better 48 so the channel is neutral most of the time and worse more than eight times as often as it is better
The point is not that a spoken price is dishonest. It is that a spoken price arrives after a wait and is accepted in the moment, where a printed one can be compared before it is taken.